AMD EPYC 9684X
AMD EPYC 9174F
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD EPYC 9684X vs AMD EPYC 9174F. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
AMD EPYC 9684X
AMD EPYC 9684X
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD EPYC 9174F
AMD EPYC 9174F

Compare AMD EPYC 9684X VS AMD EPYC 9174F. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9684X boasts a maximum frequency of 2.55 GHz GHz. 96 / 192 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 400 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2023, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD EPYC 9174F features a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz GHz. 16 / 32 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 320 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD EPYC 9684X Reasons to consider
AMD EPYC 9684X
Report a bug
  • More number of cores

    80 times more cores

    96 left arrow 16

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD EPYC 9684X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
AMD EPYC 9174F Reasons to consider
AMD EPYC 9174F
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    30 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 38% better clock speed

    4.10 GHz left arrow 2.55 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 16 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.40 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.8 times less performance per watt

    320 W left arrow 400 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD EPYC 9174F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    38 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    99 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    52 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD EPYC 9684X AMD EPYC 9684X
AMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 9174F
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Family
    AMD EPYC left arrow AMD EPYC
  • CPU group
    AMD EPYC 9004 left arrow AMD EPYC 9004
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 4
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    96 / 192 left arrow 16 / 32
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Cores
    96x Zen 4 left arrow 16x Zen 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    2.55 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.70 GHz left arrow 4.40 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD EPYC 9174F and AMD EPYC 9684X. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-4800
  • Max. Memory
    6144 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • Memory channels
    12 left arrow 12
  • Bandwidth
    461.0 GB/s left arrow 461.0 GB/s
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128 left arrow 5.0 x 128
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9684X and AMD EPYC 9174F to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 400 W
  • TDP down
    320 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9684X and AMD EPYC 9174F, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    Chiplet left arrow Chiplet
  • Socket
    SP5 left arrow SP5
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 16.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    1,152.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) left arrow Genoa (Zen 4)
  • Operating systems
    Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 left arrow Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI left arrow SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Release price
    14756 $ left arrow 3850 $
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow 100-000000796
  • Documents
    Technical data sheet left arrow Technical data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9684X and AMD EPYC 9174F.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons