AMD FX-8140
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-8140 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2012
AMD FX-8140
AMD FX-8140
Released
Q3/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2

Compare AMD FX-8140 VS Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD FX-8140 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 95 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2012, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 features a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz GHz. 10 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 130 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD FX-8140 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8140
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    929 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 12% better overclocked clock speed

    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    95 W left arrow 130 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8140 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    451 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    336 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    722 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    816 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 1.25 times more cores

    10 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    918 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    226 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    896 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    369 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    515 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    77 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    491 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    127 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    340 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-8140 AMD FX-8140
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow Intel Xeon E5
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-8000 left arrow Intel Xeon E5 v2
  • Successor
    -- left arrow Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 10
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.10 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 20
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 and AMD FX-8140. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 40
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-8140 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    95 W left arrow 130 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8140 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 25.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Vishera (Bulldozer) left arrow Ivy Bridge EP
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow LGA 2011
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow Q3/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-8140 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1
AMD FX-8140
1.39
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
5.52
AMD FX-8140
14.66
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
6845
AMD FX-8140
16394
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2

Latest comparisons