Elbrus-2S3
Apple M1
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Elbrus-2S3 vs Apple M1. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2021
Elbrus-2S3
Elbrus-2S3
Released
Q4/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
Apple M1
Apple M1

Compare Elbrus-2S3 VS Apple M1. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Elbrus-2S3 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 10 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Apple M1 features a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2020, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

Elbrus-2S3 Reasons to consider
Elbrus-2S3
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    10 W left arrow 15 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Elbrus-2S3 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
Apple M1 Reasons to consider
Apple M1
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    182 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 38% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.0 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    8 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Apple M1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    128 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    216 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    117 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    346 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    57 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    106 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    86 place

Specifications

Technical data
Elbrus-2S3 Elbrus-2S3
Apple M1 Apple M1
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Elbrus left arrow Apple M series
  • CPU group
    Elbrus-2 left arrow Apple M1
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.0 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 (+1 3D, +2 2D, +4 video) left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 8
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Elbrus-2S3. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200 left arrow LPDDR4X-4266
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Elbrus-2S3 and Apple M1 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    10 W left arrow 15 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Elbrus-2S3 and Apple M1, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • L2-Cache
    4 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Socket
    FCBGA 1903 left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q2/2021 left arrow Q4/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Elbrus-2S3 and Apple M1.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons