Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Intel Atom C3950
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Intel Atom C3950. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Atom C3950
Intel Atom C3950

Compare Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 VS Intel Atom C3950. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz GHz. 18 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 120 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Atom C3950 features a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz GHz. 16 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 24 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2017, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    416 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 23% better clock speed

    2.20 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    18 left arrow 16
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 33% better overclocked clock speed

    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    562 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    99 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    629 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    126 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    211 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    32 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    264 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    42 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    251 place
Intel Atom C3950 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C3950
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.2 times less performance per watt

    24 W left arrow 120 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom C3950 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Intel Atom C3950 Intel Atom C3950
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v4 left arrow Intel Atom C3000
  • Predecessor
    Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.20 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    18 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    36 left arrow 16
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 256 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow 16
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Intel Atom C3950 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    120 W left arrow 24 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Intel Atom C3950, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 16.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    45.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Broadwell E left arrow Denverton
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 2011-3 left arrow BGA 1310
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q3/2017

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Intel Atom C3950.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons