Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Released
Q2/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
HiSilicon Kirin 658
HiSilicon Kirin 658

Compare Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 VS HiSilicon Kirin 658. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.Released in Q1/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

HiSilicon Kirin 658 features a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q2/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1674 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1391 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1327 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1448 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    103 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1824 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 18% better clock speed

    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 23 % better overclocked clock speed

    2.35 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 658 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1433 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1375 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1720 place

Specifications

Technical data
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Qualcomm Snapdragon left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 650
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.40 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    1.80 GHz left arrow 2.35 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (8 Cores)
    1.40 GHz left arrow 2.35 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A72 left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Qualcomm Adreno 510 left arrow ARM Mali-T830 MP2
  • GPU frequency
    0.60 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.60 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • Execution units
    0 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    128 left arrow 32
  • Max. displays
    0 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    5 left arrow Midgard 4
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 28nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q4/2015
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 652. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and HiSilicon Kirin 658 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and HiSilicon Kirin 658, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q2/2016
  • Part Number
    MSM8976 left arrow --

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and HiSilicon Kirin 658.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
256
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
183
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
976
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
815
HiSilicon Kirin 658
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
154
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
41
HiSilicon Kirin 658

Latest comparisons