Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU). Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Exynos 2200
Released
Q3/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)

Compare Samsung Exynos 2200 VS Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU). Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Samsung Exynos 2200 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.Released in Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) features a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 10 / 10 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 30 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    569 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    365 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    665 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    222 place
  • AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
    6 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    105 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 13% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 1.25 times more cores

    10 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    108 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    136 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    7 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    102 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    140 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    19 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    251 place

Specifications

Technical data
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow Apple M series
  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 2200 left arrow Apple M1
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 1
  • Predecessor
    Samsung Exynos 2100 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    8 / 8 left arrow 10 / 10
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    1x Cortex-X2 left arrow 8x Firestorm
  • B-Core
    3x Cortex-A710 left arrow 2x Icestorm
  • C-Core
    4x Cortex-A510 left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Samsung Xclipse 920 (RDNA 2) left arrow Apple M1 Pro (14 Core)
  • GPU frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.30 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    24 left arrow 224
  • Shader
    384 left arrow 1792
  • Max. GPU Memory
    4 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Max. displays
    0 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • Direct X
    12 left arrow --
  • Technology
    4 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q3/2021
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Memory
    12 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • PCIe
    left arrow 4.0
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU) to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 30 W
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 40 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU), including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv9-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 28.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 left arrow M1
  • Technology
    4 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q3/2021
  • Part Number
    SM-S908B left arrow APL 1103

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU).

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1186
Samsung Exynos 2200
1768
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
3586
Samsung Exynos 2200
12574
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
1422
Samsung Exynos 2200
4580
Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)

Latest comparisons