Intel Atom C3308
Intel Celeron J3355
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom C3308 vs Intel Celeron J3355. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Intel Atom C3308
Intel Atom C3308
Released
Q3/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron J3355
Intel Celeron J3355

Compare Intel Atom C3308 VS Intel Celeron J3355. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Atom C3308 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 9.5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron J3355 features a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 10 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

Intel Atom C3308 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C3308
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    9.5 W left arrow 10 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom C3308 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1598 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 20% better clock speed

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 16 % better overclocked clock speed

    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J3355 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1010 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1032 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1305 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1476 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1473 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    785 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    847 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    633 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    724 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    218 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1298 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Atom C3308 Intel Atom C3308
Intel Celeron J3355 Intel Celeron J3355
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 7
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom C3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.60 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.10 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    2.10 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 500
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 12
  • Shader
    left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q3/2016
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J3355 and Intel Atom C3308. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow 6
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Celeron J3355 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    9.5 W left arrow 10 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Celeron J3355, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Denverton left arrow Apollo Lake
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1310 left arrow BGA 1296
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Celeron J3355.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons