NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs Matrox LUMA A310F. Specifications, performance, tests

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

• Based on
  NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Intel Arc A310 Graphics
• GPU Chip
  AD102-300 / AD102-301 (Ada Lovelace) ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
• Streaming Multiprocessors
  128 96
• Shader
  16384 768
• Render Output Units
  192 16
• Texture Units
  512 32
• Raytracing Cores
  128 6

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

• Memory Size
  24 GB 4 GB
• Memory Type
  GDDR6X GDDR6
• Memory Clock
  1.313 GHz 1.938 GHz
• Memory Speed
  21.0 Gbps 15.5 Gbps
• Memory bandwidth
  1008 GB/s 124 GB/s
• Memory Interface
  384 bit 64 bit

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

• Base Clock
  2.235 GHz 2.000 GHz
• Boost Clock
  2.520 GHz 2.000 GHz
• Avg (Game) Clock
  -- --
• Overclocking
  Yes Yes

This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

• TDP
  450 W 50 W-33 %
• TDP (up)
  450 W-25 % --
• Tjunction max
  90 °C --
• PCIe-Power
  -- --

This section compares the cooling systems of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

• Fan-Type
  Axial Radial
• Fan 1
  2 x 110 mm 1 x 70 mm
• Fan 2
  -- --
• Cooler-Type
  Air cooling Air cooling
• Noise (Idle)
  0 dB / Silent 0 dB / Silent
• Noise (Load)
  39 dB --

This section compares the connectivity options available on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

• Max. Displays
  4 4
• HDCP-Version
  2.3 2.3
• HDMI Ports
  1x HDMI v2.1 --
• DP Ports
  3x DP v1.4a 4x DP v2.1
• DVI Ports
  -- --
• VGA Ports
  -- --
• USB-C Ports
  -- --

This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

• Max. resolution
  7680x4320 7680x4320
• DirectX
  12_2 (Ultimate) 12_2 (Ultimate)
• Raytracing
  Yes Yes
• DLSS / FSR
  Yes No
• LED
  No LED lighting No LED lighting

This section compares the support for video codecs on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

• h264
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• h265 / HEVC
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• VP8
  Decode No
• VP9
  Decode Decode / Encode
• AV1
  Decode Decode / Encode

This section compares the physical dimensions of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

• Length
  304 mm 168 mm
• Height
  137 mm 69 mm
• Width
  61 mm --
• Width (Slots)
  3 PCIe-Slots 1 PCIe-Slots
• Weight
  -- --

This section provides additional information about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

• GPU Interface
  PCIe 4.0 x 16 PCIe 4.0 x 8
• Release date
  Q4/2022 Q2/2023
• Launch Price
  1,599 $ (Reference) --
• Structure size
  4 nm 6 nm
• Part-no
  -- LUMA-A310F
• Documents
  data sheet data sheet