Select processor 1
Select processor 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Matrox LUMA A310F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs Matrox LUMA A310F. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Released
Q2/2023
Overall score
star star star star star
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F

Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and the Matrox LUMA A310F to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 to the Matrox LUMA A310F in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 24 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6X. It was released in Q4/2022.

Matrox LUMA A310F: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.000 GHz GHz. It comes with 4 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q2/2023.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    83% more memory

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place

Specifications

Technical data
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 left arrow Intel Arc A310 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    AD102-300 / AD102-301 (Ada Lovelace) left arrow ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    128 left arrow 96
  • Shader
    16384 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    192 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    512 left arrow 32
  • Raytracing Cores
    128 left arrow 6
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    24 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6X left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.313 GHz left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    21.0 Gbps left arrow 15.5 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    1008 GB/s left arrow 124 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    384 bit left arrow 64 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Base Clock
    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.520 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    450 W left arrow 50 W-33 %
  • TDP (up)
    450 W-25 % left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    90 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow --
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Radial
  • Fan 1
    2 x 110 mm left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    39 dB left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 4x DP v2.1
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Length
    304 mm left arrow 168 mm
  • Height
    137 mm left arrow 69 mm
  • Width
    61 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 1 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2023
  • Launch Price
    1,599 $ (Reference) left arrow --
  • Structure size
    4 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow LUMA-A310F
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
82.58
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F

Latest comparisons