Comparar Intel Atom C3308 VS Intel Celeron J3355. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Atom C3308 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 9.5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Lançado em Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Celeron J3355 features a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 10 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razões a considerar Desempenho por watt
menos calor gerado pelo processador, W.
10 W
Posições comuns Intel Atom C3308 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
No data
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 20% melhor velocidade do relógio
1.60 GHz
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 16 % melhor velocidade de relógio overclock
2.10 GHz
Posições comuns Intel Celeron J3355 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Intel Atom C3308
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
Intel Celeron
7
Intel Celeron J3000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.00 GHz
2
2.50 GHz
2
2.50 GHz
Não
Não
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Intel HD Graphics 500
0.25 GHz
0.70 GHz
12
96
8 GB
3
9
12
14 nm
Q3/2016
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Não
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J3355 e Intel Atom C3308. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
Não
2
2.0
6
Sim
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Atom C3308 e Intel Celeron J3355 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
10 W
--
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Atom C3308 e Intel Celeron J3355, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
--
2.00 MB
Apollo Lake
14 nm
BGA 1296
Q3/2016
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Atom C3308 e Intel Celeron J3355.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
