AMD A9-9425
AMD A9-9410
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A9-9425 vs AMD A9-9410. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2017
AMD A9-9425
AMD A9-9425
Released
Q2/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD A9-9410
AMD A9-9410

Compare AMD A9-9425 VS AMD A9-9410. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD A9-9425 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 15 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD A9-9410 features a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 25 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD A9-9425 Reasons to consider
AMD A9-9425
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1476 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    3.10 GHz left arrow 2.90 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 5% better overclocked clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    15 W left arrow 25 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A9-9425 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    533 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    515 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    888 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    991 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1144 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1367 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1117 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    422 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    755 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1148 place
AMD A9-9410 Reasons to consider
AMD A9-9410
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1542 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A9-9410 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    981 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1006 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1147 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    603 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    777 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1132 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD A9-9425 AMD A9-9425
AMD A9-9410 AMD A9-9410
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    AMD A9-9000 left arrow AMD A9-9000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.10 GHz left arrow 2.90 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    3.10 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) left arrow AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
  • GPU frequency
    0.85 GHz left arrow 0.80 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    3 left arrow 3
  • Shader
    192 left arrow 192
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q2/2016
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD A9-9410 and AMD A9-9425. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR4-2133
  • Max. Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    8 left arrow 8
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A9-9425 and AMD A9-9410 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 25 W
  • TDP up
    25 W left arrow --
  • TDP down
    10 W left arrow 10 W
  • Tjunction max.
    90 °C left arrow 90 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A9-9425 and AMD A9-9410, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Stoney Ridge (Excavator) left arrow Stoney Ridge (Excavator)
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    FP4 left arrow FP4
  • Release date
    Q2/2017 left arrow Q2/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A9-9425 and AMD A9-9410.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
82
AMD A9-9425
63
AMD A9-9410
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
141
AMD A9-9425
130
AMD A9-9410
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
325
AMD A9-9425
307
AMD A9-9410
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1
AMD A9-9425
0.8
AMD A9-9410
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.6
AMD A9-9425
1.6
AMD A9-9410
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2450
AMD A9-9425
2530
AMD A9-9410

Latest comparisons