AMD E-240
AMD E-300
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E-240 vs AMD E-300. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2011
AMD E-240
AMD E-240
Released
Q3/2011
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD E-300
AMD E-300

Compare AMD E-240 VS AMD E-300. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD E-240 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz GHz. 1 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 18 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD E-300 features a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 18 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD E-240 Reasons to consider
AMD E-240
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1722 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 13% better clock speed

    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E-240 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1615 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    908 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    928 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    809 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1409 place
AMD E-300 Reasons to consider
AMD E-300
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1746 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    2 left arrow 1

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E-300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1489 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1555 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1616 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    912 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    916 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    758 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    788 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1387 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD E-240 AMD E-240
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow AMD E
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    AMD E/E1/E2-1000 left arrow AMD E/E1/E2-1000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    1 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    1 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6310 left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6310
  • GPU frequency
    0.49 GHz left arrow 0.49 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow 1
  • Shader
    80 left arrow 80
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 1 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 3
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow 40 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow Q4/2010
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD E-300 and AMD E-240. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR3-1066
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 1
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD E-240 and AMD E-300 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    18 W left arrow 18 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD E-240 and AMD E-300, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Zacate (Bobcat) left arrow Zacate (Bobcat)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 413 left arrow BGA 413
  • Release date
    Q1/2011 left arrow Q3/2011

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD E-240 and AMD E-300.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
79
AMD E-240
79
AMD E-300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
532
AMD E-240
489
AMD E-300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
529
AMD E-240
877
AMD E-300
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
0.26
AMD E-240
0.48
AMD E-300
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
371
AMD E-240
627
AMD E-300

Latest comparisons