AMD E2-1800
AMD Epyc 72F3
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E2-1800 vs AMD Epyc 72F3. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
AMD E2-1800
AMD E2-1800
Released
Q1/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Epyc 72F3
AMD Epyc 72F3

Compare AMD E2-1800 VS AMD Epyc 72F3. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD E2-1800 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 18 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Epyc 72F3 features a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 180 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD E2-1800 Reasons to consider
AMD E2-1800
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1729 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    18 W left arrow 180 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E2-1800 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1467 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1547 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1514 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    896 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    902 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    664 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    799 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1363 place
AMD Epyc 72F3 Reasons to consider
AMD Epyc 72F3
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 54% better clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    8 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Epyc 72F3 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    222 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD E2-1800 AMD E2-1800
AMD Epyc 72F3 AMD Epyc 72F3
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow AMD Epyc
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD E1/E2-1000 left arrow AMD Epyc 7003
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.70 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 16
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 7340 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.54 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.70 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow
  • Shader
    80 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    4 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q2/2012 left arrow
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Epyc 72F3 and AMD E2-1800. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 8
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 128
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD E2-1800 and AMD Epyc 72F3 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    18 W left arrow 180 W
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 200 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 165 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD E2-1800 and AMD Epyc 72F3, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Zacate (Bobcat) left arrow Milan (Zen 3)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 413 left arrow SP3
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q1/2021

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD E2-1800 and AMD Epyc 72F3.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons