AMD E2-3800
Intel Celeron N3010
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E2-3800 vs Intel Celeron N3010. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2013
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-3800
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N3010
Intel Celeron N3010

Compare AMD E2-3800 VS Intel Celeron N3010. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD E2-3800 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 15 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron N3010 features a maximum frequency of 1.04 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 4 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD E2-3800 Reasons to consider
AMD E2-3800
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 20% better clock speed

    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.04 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD E2-3800 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1507 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1274 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1472 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.27 times less performance per watt

    4 W left arrow 15 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N3010 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1042 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1046 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1491 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    841 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    875 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    805 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    812 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    319 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1344 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    292 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD E2-3800 AMD E2-3800
Intel Celeron N3010 Intel Celeron N3010
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
  • CPU group
    AMD E2-3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.04 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2.24 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 8280 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    0.45 GHz left arrow 0.32 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    128 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    5 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11.1 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N3010 and AMD E2-3800. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 4
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD E2-3800 and Intel Celeron N3010 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 4 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD E2-3800 and Intel Celeron N3010, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Braswell
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD E2-3800 and Intel Celeron N3010.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
115
AMD E2-3800
126
Intel Celeron N3010
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1645
AMD E2-3800
1001
Intel Celeron N3010

Latest comparisons