Intel Celeron N4000
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2017
Intel Celeron N4000
Intel Celeron N4000
Released
Q1/2008
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Compare Intel Celeron N4000 VS Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Celeron N4000 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 6 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 features a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2008, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1602 left arrow score
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 4% better overclocked clock speed

    2.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    6 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N4000 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    949 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    996 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1242 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1399 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1497 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    921 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    926 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    607 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    736 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1293 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    284 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1433 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 56% better clock speed

    2.50 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    552 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    445 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1304 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1285 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    750 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    623 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1066 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N4000 Intel Celeron N4000
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 left arrow Intel Core 2 Quad
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.10 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 600 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.20 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.65 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow
  • Shader
    96 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 and Intel Celeron N4000. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow
  • Max. Memory
    8 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 0
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron N4000 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    6 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N4000 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE3
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 6.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Gemini Lake left arrow Yorkfield
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1090 left arrow AM1
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q1/2008

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron N4000 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
396
Intel Celeron N4000
352
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
671
Intel Celeron N4000
1093
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
398
Intel Celeron N4000
1478
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
707
Intel Celeron N4000
4983
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1429
Intel Celeron N4000
3156
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Latest comparisons