Samsung Exynos 1280
MediaTek Dimensity 920
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Samsung Exynos 1280
Samsung Exynos 1280
Released
Q3/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
MediaTek Dimensity 920
MediaTek Dimensity 920

Compare Samsung Exynos 1280 VS MediaTek Dimensity 920. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Samsung Exynos 1280 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.Released in Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

MediaTek Dimensity 920 features a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 10 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    894 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 17% better clock speed

    2.40 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 1280 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    867 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    993 place
  • AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
    27 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    247 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    267 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1018 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions MediaTek Dimensity 920 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    829 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1387 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    24 place
  • AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
    23 place

Specifications

Technical data
Samsung Exynos 1280 Samsung Exynos 1280
MediaTek Dimensity 920 MediaTek Dimensity 920
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow Mediatek Dimensity
  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 1280 left arrow MediaTek Dimensity 900/920
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 2
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-G68 MP4 left arrow ARM Mali-G68 MP4
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    64 left arrow 64
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 1
  • Generation
    Vallhall 2 left arrow Vallhall 2
  • Technology
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2020 left arrow Q2/2020
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by MediaTek Dimensity 920 and Samsung Exynos 1280. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR4XLPDDR5 left arrow LPDDR4XLPDDR5
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 16 GB
  • Memory channels
    4 (Quad Channel) left arrow 4
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Samsung Exynos 1280 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 1280 and MediaTek Dimensity 920, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Socket
    -- left arrow N/A
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A78/-A55 left arrow Cortex-A78 / Cortex-A55
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q3/2021

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Samsung Exynos 1280 and MediaTek Dimensity 920.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
741
Samsung Exynos 1280
789
MediaTek Dimensity 920
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1855
Samsung Exynos 1280
2486
MediaTek Dimensity 920

Latest comparisons