AMD C-60
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

AMD C-60 contre AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q3/2011
AMD C-60
AMD C-60
Libéré
Q3/2009
Note globale
star star star star star
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Comparez AMD C-60 VS AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD C-60 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.00 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 9 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q3/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 features a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz GHz. 2 / 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 18 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2009, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD C-60 Raisons de considérer
AMD C-60
Signaler un bogue
  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    1611 left arrow score
  • Performance par watt

    moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.

    9 W left arrow 18 W

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes AMD C-60 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    594 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    535 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1485 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1553 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1640 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    914 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    920 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    753 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    794 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    372 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1393 place
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 33% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

No data

Spécifications

Données techniques
AMD C-60 AMD C-60
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
CPU famille et groupe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Série
    AMD C left arrow AMD Athlon
  • Génération
    1 left arrow Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktnt la mémoire du système.
  • Groupe de CPU
    AMD C left arrow Unknown M
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Fréquence
    1.00 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Oui left arrow Non
  • Architecture de base
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nom du GPU
    AMD Radeon HD 6290 left arrow pas d'iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.28 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.40 GHz left arrow Pas de turbo
  • Unités d'exécution
    1 left arrow
  • Shader
    80 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Génération
    3 left arrow
  • Processus technologique
    40 nm left arrow
  • Date de sortie
    Q3/2011 left arrow
Prise en charge des codecs matériels

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Non left arrow Non
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Non left arrow Non
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP8
    Non left arrow Non
  • AV1
    Non left arrow Non
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Non
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Non
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Non
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 et AMD C-60. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Type de mémoire
    DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR2
  • ECC
    Non left arrow Non
  • Canaux de mémoire
    1 left arrow 2
Consommation d'énergie

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD C-60 et AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    9 W left arrow 18 W
  • Température maximale
    -- left arrow 95 °C
Technologies et extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD C-60 et AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Jeu d'instructions (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow Inconnu
  • Extensions ISA
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow Inconnu
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 1.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Ontario (Bobcat) left arrow Inconnu
  • Processus technologique
    40 nm left arrow
  • Socket
    BGA 413 left arrow ASB1
  • Date de sortie
    Q3/2011 left arrow Q3/2009

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD C-60 et AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Dernières comparaisons