AMD EPYC 9384X
AMD EPYC 9354
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

AMD EPYC 9384X contre AMD EPYC 9354. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q2/2023
AMD EPYC 9384X
AMD EPYC 9384X
Libéré
Q4/2022
Note globale
star star star star star
AMD EPYC 9354
AMD EPYC 9354

Comparez AMD EPYC 9384X VS AMD EPYC 9354. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9384X boasts a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz GHz. 32 / 64 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 320 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q2/2023, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD EPYC 9354 features a maximum frequency of 3.25 GHz GHz. 32 / 64 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 280 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD EPYC 9384X Raisons de considérer
AMD EPYC 9384X
Signaler un bogue
  • Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée

    Autour de 3% meilleure vitesse d'horloge overclockée

    3.90 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes AMD EPYC 9384X CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

No data
AMD EPYC 9354 Raisons de considérer
AMD EPYC 9354
Signaler un bogue
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 5% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    3.25 GHz left arrow 3.10 GHz
  • Performance par watt

    About 0.88 moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.

    280 W left arrow 320 W

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes AMD EPYC 9354 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

No data

Spécifications

Données techniques
AMD EPYC 9384X AMD EPYC 9384X
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
CPU famille et groupe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Série
    AMD EPYC left arrow AMD EPYC
  • Groupe de CPU
    AMD EPYC 9004 left arrow AMD EPYC 9004
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Génération
    4 left arrow 4
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    32 / 64 left arrow 32 / 64
  • Architecture de base
    normal left arrow normal
  • Cœurs
    32x Zen 4 left arrow 32x Zen 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • Overclocking
    Non left arrow Non
  • Fréquence
    3.10 GHz left arrow 3.25 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.90 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (32 Cores)
    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.75 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nom du GPU
    pas d'iGPU left arrow pas d'iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    Pas de turbo left arrow Pas de turbo
Prise en charge des codecs matériels

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Non left arrow Non
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Non left arrow Non
  • h264
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP8
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Non left arrow Non
  • AV1
    Non left arrow Non
  • AVC
    Non left arrow Non
  • VC-1
    Non left arrow Non
  • JPEG
    Non left arrow Non
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD EPYC 9354 et AMD EPYC 9384X. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Type de mémoire
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-4800
  • Max. Mémoire
    6144 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • Canaux de mémoire
    12 left arrow 12
  • Bandwidth
    461.0 GB/s left arrow 461.0 GB/s
  • ECC
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128 left arrow 5.0 x 128
  • AES-NI
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9384X et AMD EPYC 9354 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP up
    400 W left arrow 300 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 240 W
  • Température maximale
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies et extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9384X et AMD EPYC 9354, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Processus technologique
    5 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    Chiplet left arrow Chiplet
  • Socket
    SP5 left arrow SP5
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 32.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    768.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) left arrow Genoa (Zen 4)
  • Operating systems
    Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 left arrow Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Jeu d'instructions (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Extensions ISA
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI left arrow SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
  • Date de sortie
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Release price
    5529 $ left arrow 3420 $
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow 100-000000798
  • spécification
    Technical data sheet left arrow Technical data sheet

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9384X et AMD EPYC 9354.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Dernières comparaisons