Intel Celeron 3965Y
Intel Celeron J3355
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

Intel Celeron 3965Y contre Intel Celeron J3355. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q2/2017
Intel Celeron 3965Y
Intel Celeron 3965Y
Libéré
Q3/2016
Note globale
star star star star star
Intel Celeron J3355
Intel Celeron J3355

Comparez Intel Celeron 3965Y VS Intel Celeron J3355. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Celeron 3965Y boasts a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 6 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q2/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron J3355 features a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 10 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    1787 left arrow score
  • Performance par watt

    moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.

    6 W left arrow 10 W

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Intel Celeron 3965Y CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1267 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1421 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1110 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1278 place
  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    1598 left arrow score
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 25% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Intel Celeron J3355 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1010 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1032 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1305 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1476 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1473 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    785 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    847 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    633 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    724 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    218 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1298 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
Intel Celeron 3965Y Intel Celeron 3965Y
Intel Celeron J3355 Intel Celeron J3355
CPU famille et groupe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Série
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Génération
    7 left arrow 7
  • Groupe de CPU
    Intel Celeron 3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Fréquence
    1.50 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • Cœurs de CPU
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 cœur)
    Pas de turbo left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Fils de processeur
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    Pas de turbo left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    Non left arrow Non
  • Overclocking
    Non left arrow Non
  • Architecture de base
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nom du GPU
    Intel HD Graphics 615 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 500
  • GPU frequency
    0.30 GHz left arrow 0.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.85 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • Unités d'exécution
    24 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    192 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    16 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Génération
    9.5 left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Processus technologique
    14nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Date de sortie
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q3/2016
Prise en charge des codecs matériels

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Non left arrow Non
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J3355 et Intel Celeron 3965Y. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Type de mémoire
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMMLPDDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
  • Max. Mémoire
    16 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Non left arrow Non
  • Canaux de mémoire
    2 left arrow 2
  • Version PCIe
    3.0 left arrow 2.0
  • Couloirs PCIe
    10 left arrow 6
Cryptage
  • AES-NI
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron 3965Y et Intel Celeron J3355 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    6 W left arrow 10 W
  • TDP down
    4.5 W left arrow --
  • Température maximale
    100 °C left arrow --
Technologies et extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron 3965Y et Intel Celeron J3355, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Jeu d'instructions (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Extensions ISA
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Kaby Lake U left arrow Apollo Lake
  • Processus technologique
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1515 left arrow BGA 1296
  • Date de sortie
    Q2/2017 left arrow Q3/2016

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron 3965Y et Intel Celeron J3355.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
376
Intel Celeron 3965Y
299
Intel Celeron J3355
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
727
Intel Celeron 3965Y
571
Intel Celeron J3355
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Les performances de l'iGPU - le GPU interne dans les jeux.
326
Intel Celeron 3965Y
134
Intel Celeron J3355
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark est une suite de tests qui effectue des calculs mathématiques complexes pour déterminer les performances du CPU en matière de compression de fichiers, de cryptage et de tâches liées à la physique.
1607
Intel Celeron 3965Y
1341
Intel Celeron J3355

Dernières comparaisons