Comparez Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 VS AMD FX-6350. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q3/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD FX-6350 features a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 125 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
score
Positions communes Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
score
Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 5% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
3.70 GHz
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
About 1.5 Plus de cœurs
4
Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée
Autour de 7 Vitesse d'horloge overclockée améliorée de %
3.90 GHz
Performance par watt
About 0.96 moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.
130 W
Positions communes AMD FX-6350 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD FX
2
AMD FX-6300
--
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.90 GHz
6
4.20 GHz
6
Non
Oui
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
pas d'iGPU
Pas de turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD FX-6350 et Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866
Oui
2
Oui
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 et AMD FX-6350 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
125 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 et AMD FX-6350, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
8.00 MB
Vishera (Bulldozer)
32 nm
AM3+
Q2/2013
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 et AMD FX-6350.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
