Seleziona il processore 1
Seleziona il processore 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Matrox LUMA A310 contro NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. Specifiche, prestazioni, test

Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Rilasciato
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Rilasciato
Q3/2022
Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310 and the NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310 to the NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.512 GHz GHz. It comes with 80 GBGB of memory. The memory type is HBM2e. Released in Q1 Q3/2022.

Differenze

Videokards Motivi da considerare
Matrox LUMA A310
Segnala un bug
  • Velocità di clock più alta

    Intorno a 24% migliore velocità di clock

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Più memoria

    95% più memoria

    80 GB left arrow 4 GB

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB GPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    8 place

Specifiche

Dati tecnici
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Chip GPU
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow GA100
  • Unità di uscita del rendering
    16 left arrow 160
  • Unità di texture
    32 left arrow 432
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Dimensione della memoria
    4 GB left arrow 80 GB
  • Tipo di memoria
    GDDR6 left arrow HBM2e
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz
  • Velocità della memoria
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 3 Gbps
  • Interfaccia di memoria
    64 bit left arrow 5120 bit
Frequenza di clock

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Frequenza di base
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.065 GHz
  • Frequenza massima
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.41 GHz
Consumo di energia

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 250 W
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Risoluzione massima
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12.2
Dimensioni

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Lunghezza
    168 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 112 mm
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interfaccia GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Data di rilascio
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Processo tecnologico
    6 nm left arrow 7 nm

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB Performance relative to other GPU chips
153%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
136%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
100%
89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Ultimi confronti