비교 AMD FX-8300 VS AMD A4-6300. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD FX-8300 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 95 W W, it ensures efficient performance.에 출시 Q2/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD A4-6300 features a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
score
더 많은 코어 수
6 몇 배 더 많은 코어
2
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도
주변 7% 더 나은 오버클럭 클럭 속도
3.90 GHz
공통 위치 AMD FX-8300 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
score
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 11% 더 나은 클럭 속도
3.30 GHz
와트당 성능
정a보 0.68 와트당 성능 몇 배 감소
95 W
공통 위치 AMD A4-6300 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
AMD FX-8300
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD A
3
AMD A4-6000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.70 GHz
2
3.90 GHz
2
아니요
아니요
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
0.76 GHz
터보 없음
2
128
2 GB
2
5
11.2
32 nm
Q2/2013
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
아니요
아니요
Decode
아니요
아니요
아니요
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD A4-6300 그리고 AMD FX-8300. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866
아니요
2
예
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-8300 그리고 AMD A4-6300 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
65 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8300 그리고 AMD A4-6300, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
1.00 MB
Richland (Piledriver)
32 nm
FM2
Q2/2013
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-8300 그리고 AMD A4-6300.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
