프로세서 1 선택
프로세서 2 선택
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel Arc A350M. 사양, 성능, 테스트

종합 점수
star star star star star
출시
Q4/2022
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
출시
Q2/2022
종합 점수
star star star star star
Intel Arc A350M
Intel Arc A350M

Comparison of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada and the Intel Arc A350M to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada to the Intel Arc A350M in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 48 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q4/2022.

Intel Arc A350M: It has a maximum clock speed of 0.3 GHz GHz. It comes with 4 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q2/2022.

차이점

Videokards 고려해야 하는 이유
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
버그 신고하기
  • 더 빠른 클럭 속도

    주변 85% 더 나은 클럭 속도

    2.0 GHz left arrow 0.3 GHz
  • 더 많은 메모리

    92메모리 % 증가

    48 GB left arrow 4 GB

모든 순위의 순위

공통 위치 NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 GPU.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    10 place
Videokards 고려해야 하는 이유
Intel Arc A350M
버그 신고하기

모든 순위의 순위

공통 위치 Intel Arc A350M 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 GPU.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    33 place

사양

기술 데이터
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
Intel Arc A350M Intel Arc A350M
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • GPU 칩
    AD102 left arrow DG2-128 / Alchemist
  • 실행 단위
    18176 left arrow 768
  • 렌더링 출력 유닛 (ROP)
    192 left arrow 24
  • 텍스처 단위 (TMU)
    568 left arrow 48
  • L1 Cache
    128 KB left arrow 아니요
  • L2 Cache
    96 MB left arrow 4 MB
  • RT Cores
    142 left arrow 6
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • 메모리 크기
    48 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • 메모리 유형
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    2.0 GHz left arrow 1.75 GHz
  • 메모리 속도
    16 Gbps left arrow 14 Gbps
  • 메모리 밴드위드
    768.0 GB/s left arrow 112.0 GB/s
  • 메모리 인터페이스
    384 bit left arrow 64 bit
클럭 속도

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • 기본 시계
    2.175 GHz left arrow 0.3 GHz
  • 부스트 클럭
    2.535 GHz left arrow 1.15 GHz
열 관리

This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 25 W
  • Power Connectors
    1x 16-pin left arrow 아니요
  • 슬롯
    Dual-slot left arrow IGP
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • 최대 해상도
    3840x2160 left arrow 2560x1440
  • DirectX
    12.2 left arrow 12.2
  • OpenGL
    4.6 left arrow 4.6
  • OpenCL
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • Vulkan
    1.3 left arrow 1.3
  • Shader Model
    6.7 left arrow 6.6
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • 아키텍처
    Ada Lovelace left arrow Xe HPG / Generation 12.7
  • 구조 크기
    4 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • 릴리스 날짜
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2022
이론적 성능

  • 픽셀 속도
    486.7 GPixel/s left arrow 27.60 GPixel/s
  • 텍스처 속도
    1,440 GTexel/s left arrow 55.20 GTexel/s
  • FP16 (half)
    92.15 TFLOPS (1:1) left arrow 3.533 TFLOPS
  • FP32 (float)
    92.15 TFLOPS left arrow 1.766 TFLOPS
  • FP64 (double)
    1,440 GFLOPS (1:64) left arrow 441.6 GFLOPS

벤치마크

성능 테스트 GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 그리고 Intel Arc A350M.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 다른 GPU 칩 대비 성능
100%
91%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
72%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
51%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Intel Arc A350M 다른 GPU 칩 대비 성능
218%
GeForce GTX 960
164%
GeForce GTX 660
120%
GeForce GTX 470
100%
93%
GeForce GTX 460

최신 비교