Porównaj Intel Celeron J3160 VS Intel Celeron N3000. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Celeron J3160 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 6 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q1/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Celeron N3000 features a maximum frequency of 1.04 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 4 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2015, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 35% lepsza prędkość zegara
1.04 GHz
Większa liczba rdzeni
2 Więcej rdzeni
2
Wyższa prędkość zegara turbo
Wokół 7% lepsza prędkość zegara w trybie overclocked
2.08 GHz
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Celeron J3160 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wydajność na wat
About 0.67 mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
6 W
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Celeron N3000 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Intel Celeron J3160
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
Intel Celeron
8
Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.04 GHz
2
2.08 GHz
2
Nie
Nie
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Intel HD Graphics 400
0.32 GHz
0.60 GHz
12
96
8 GB
3
8
12
14 nm
Q1/2015
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nie
Nie
Decode / Encode
Nie
Decode
Nie
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N3000 oraz Intel Celeron J3160. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
Nie
2
2.0
4
Tak
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron J3160 oraz Intel Celeron N3000 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
4 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J3160 oraz Intel Celeron N3000, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
2.00 MB
Braswell
14 nm
BGA 1170
Q1/2015
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron J3160 oraz Intel Celeron N3000.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
