Comparar Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 VS Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Lançado em Q3/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 features a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 140 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 3% melhor velocidade do relógio
3.60 GHz
Desempenho por watt
menos calor gerado pelo processador, W.
140 W
Posições comuns Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Mais número de núcleos
About 1.5 Mais núcleos
4
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 3 % melhor velocidade de relógio overclock
3.90 GHz
Posições comuns Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
Intel Xeon E5
6
Intel Xeon E5 v4
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
--
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.60 GHz
6
4.00 GHz
12
Sim
Não
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
sem iGPU
Sem turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 e Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-1866DDR4-2133DDR4-2400
1532 GB
Sim
4
3.0
40
Sim
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 e Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
140 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 e Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
15.00 MB
Broadwell E
14 nm
LGA 2011-3
Q2/2016
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 e Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
