比较 AMD A12-9800 VS Elbrus-4S. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD A12-9800 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.发布于 Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Elbrus-4S features a maximum frequency of 0.8 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q4/2014, it is built to handle demanding applications.
在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 79% 更好的时钟速度
共同立场 AMD A12-9800 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
共同立场 Elbrus-4S 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
No dataComprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Elbrus-4S 和 AMD A12-9800. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A12-9800 和 Elbrus-4S to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A12-9800 和 Elbrus-4S, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A12-9800 和 Elbrus-4S.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!