Intel Xeon D-1702
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
选择视频卡1
选择视频卡2

Intel Xeon D-1702 对 Intel Core2 Duo E8500. 规格、性能、测试

总分
star star star star star
已发布
Q1/2022
Intel Xeon D-1702
Intel Xeon D-1702
已发布
Q1/2008
总分
star star star star star
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
Intel Core2 Duo E8500

比较 Intel Xeon D-1702 VS Intel Core2 Duo E8500. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon D-1702 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 2 / 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 25 W W, it ensures efficient performance.发布于 Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core2 Duo E8500 features a maximum frequency of 3.16 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2008, it is built to handle demanding applications.

差异

  • 每瓦特性能

    处理器产生的热量更少,W。

    25 W left arrow 65 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Xeon D-1702 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.

No data
  • 在总排名中的位置

    (基于几个基准)

    1789 left arrow score
  • 更高的时钟速度

    左右 49% 更好的时钟速度

    3.16 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core2 Duo E8500 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1162 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1353 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1318 place

规格

技术数据
Intel Xeon D-1702 Intel Xeon D-1702
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 Intel Core2 Duo E8500
CPU家族和团体

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • 系列
    Intel Xeon D left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • CPU组
    Intel Xeon D-1700 left arrow Intel Core 2 Duo E7000/E8000
  • 分段
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop
  • 一代人
    4 left arrow 2
  • 过去的模式
    -- left arrow 没有
  • Successor
    -- left arrow 没有
CPU技术规格

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • 核心架构
    normal left arrow normal
  • 超频
    没有 left arrow
  • 頻率
    1.60 GHz left arrow 3.16 GHz
内存规格和PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core2 Duo E8500 和 Intel Xeon D-1702. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • 存储器类型
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR2-1066 / DDR3-1333
  • 最大内存
    256 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • 记忆通道
    2 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    left arrow 没有
  • PCIe
    4.0 x 16 left arrow No data
能源消耗

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon D-1702 和 Intel Core2 Duo E8500 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    25 W left arrow 65 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    -- left arrow 没有
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 没有
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 没有
  • 最高温度
    -- left arrow 80 °C
技术和扩展

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon D-1702 和 Intel Core2 Duo E8500, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • 指令集(ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA扩展
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE 4.1
  • L2-Cache
    5.00 MB left arrow 6.00 MB
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 没有
  • 建筑学
    Ice Lake left arrow Wolfdale
  • 技术过程
    10 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • 虚拟化
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x
  • 插座
    BGA 2227 left arrow LGA 775
  • 发布日期
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2008

基准

性能测试 CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon D-1702 和 Intel Core2 Duo E8500.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

最新比较