Compare Elbrus-16S VS AMD A6-9225. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Elbrus-16S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz. 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD A6-9225 features a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2018, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
14 times more cores
2
Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 23% better clock speed
2.0 GHz
Performance per watt
About 0.12 times less performance per watt
130 W
Common positions AMD A6-9225 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Elbrus-16S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
AMD A
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.60 GHz
2
2
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD A6-9225 and Elbrus-16S. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2133
1
No
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Elbrus-16S and AMD A6-9225 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
15 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and AMD A6-9225, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
--
2.00 MB
28 nm
FP4
Q3/2018
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Elbrus-16S and AMD A6-9225.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
