Confronta Elbrus-16S VS AMD A6-9225. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Elbrus-16S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz. 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Rilasciato in Q4/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD A6-9225 features a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2018, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Motivi da considerare Più numero di core
14 Più core
2
Posizioni comuni Elbrus-16S CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
score
Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 23% migliore velocità di clock
2.0 GHz
Prestazioni per watt
About 0.12 meno calore generato dal processore, W.
130 W
Posizioni comuni AMD A6-9225 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Elbrus-16S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
AMD A
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.60 GHz
2
2
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD A6-9225 e Elbrus-16S. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2133
1
No
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Elbrus-16S e AMD A6-9225 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
15 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S e AMD A6-9225, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
--
2.00 MB
28 nm
FP4
Q3/2018
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Elbrus-16S e AMD A6-9225.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
