Compara Elbrus-16S VS AMD A6-9225. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Elbrus-16S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz. 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Publicado en Q4/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD A6-9225 features a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2018, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razones a tener en cuenta Más número de núcleos
14 Más núcleos
2
Posiciones comunes Elbrus-16S CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 23% mejor velocidad de reloj
2.0 GHz
Rendimiento por vatio
About 0.12 menos calor generado por el procesador, W.
130 W
Posiciones comunes AMD A6-9225 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Elbrus-16S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
AMD A
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.60 GHz
2
2
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD A6-9225 y Elbrus-16S. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2133
1
No
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Elbrus-16S y AMD A6-9225 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
15 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S y AMD A6-9225, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
--
2.00 MB
28 nm
FP4
Q3/2018
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Elbrus-16S y AMD A6-9225.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
