AMD EPYC 9254
AMD EPYC 9474F
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

AMD EPYC 9254 gegen AMD EPYC 9474F. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q4/2022
AMD EPYC 9254
AMD EPYC 9254
Freigegeben
Q4/2022
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
AMD EPYC 9474F
AMD EPYC 9474F

Vergleichen Sie AMD EPYC 9254 VS AMD EPYC 9474F. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9254 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz GHz. 24 / 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 200 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q4/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD EPYC 9474F features a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz GHz. 48 / 96 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 360 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

AMD EPYC 9254 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD EPYC 9254
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 1% bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.15 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • Leistung pro Watt

    weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    200 W left arrow 360 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD EPYC 9254 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    109 place
AMD EPYC 9474F Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD EPYC 9474F
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 19% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.90 GHz
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    About 2 Mehr Kerne

    48 left arrow 24

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD EPYC 9474F CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data

Specifications

Technische Daten
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
AMD EPYC 9474F AMD EPYC 9474F
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Serie
    AMD EPYC left arrow AMD EPYC
  • CPU Gruppe
    AMD EPYC 9004 left arrow AMD EPYC 9004
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 4
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    24 / 48 left arrow 48 / 96
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
  • Kerne
    24x Zen 4 left arrow 48x Zen 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Frequenz
    2.90 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    4.15 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD EPYC 9474F und AMD EPYC 9254. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-4800
  • Max. Speicher
    6144 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • Speicherkanäle
    12 left arrow 12
  • Bandwidth
    461.0 GB/s left arrow 461.0 GB/s
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128 left arrow 5.0 x 128
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9254 und AMD EPYC 9474F to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    200 W left arrow 360 W
  • TDP up
    240 W left arrow 400 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 320 W
  • Maximale Temperatur
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9254 und AMD EPYC 9474F, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • technisches verfahren
    5 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    Chiplet left arrow Chiplet
  • Steckdose
    SP5 left arrow SP5
  • L2-Cache
    24.00 MB left arrow 48.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    128.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Genoa (Zen 4) left arrow Genoa (Zen 4)
  • Operating systems
    Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 left arrow Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
  • Virtualisierung
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI left arrow SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Release price
    2299 $ left arrow 6780 $
  • Part Number
    100-000000480 left arrow 100-000000788
  • Spezifikation
    Technical data sheet left arrow Technical data sheet

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9254 und AMD EPYC 9474F.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche