Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Xeon Gold 6210U gegen AMD Ryzen 5 2500X. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
Freigegeben
Q2/2018
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon Gold 6210U VS AMD Ryzen 5 2500X. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon Gold 6210U boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 20 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 150 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X features a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2018, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Xeon Gold 6210U Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
Einen Fehler melden
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    16 Mehr Kerne

    20 left arrow 4

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon Gold 6210U CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    122 place
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    918 left arrow score
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 31% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 3 % bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.00 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.63 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    95 W left arrow 150 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen 5 2500X CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    292 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    542 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    649 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Xeon Gold 6210U Intel Xeon Gold 6210U
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Xeon Gold left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200 left arrow AMD Ryzen 2000
  • Successor
    -- left arrow AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    2.50 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    20 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    3.90 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    40 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Ja
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 2500X und Intel Xeon Gold 6210U. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Speicher
    left arrow 64 GB
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Speicherkanäle
    6 left arrow 2
  • PCIe-Version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    48 left arrow 20
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon Gold 6210U und AMD Ryzen 5 2500X to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    150 W left arrow 95 W
  • Maximale Temperatur
    -- left arrow 95 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon Gold 6210U und AMD Ryzen 5 2500X, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    27.50 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Cascade Lake left arrow Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+)
  • technisches verfahren
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Steckdose
    LGA 3647 left arrow AM4
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q2/2018

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon Gold 6210U und AMD Ryzen 5 2500X.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche