Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Xeon W-3275M gegen Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Freigegeben
Q2/2021
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y

Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon W-3275M VS Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon W-3275M boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 28 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 205 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y features a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz GHz. 24 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 165 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Xeon W-3275M Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    35 left arrow score
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 16% höhere taktfrequenz

    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    4 Mehr Kerne

    28 left arrow 24
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 26% bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    261 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    34 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    1 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    23 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    70 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    72 place
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Einen Fehler melden
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.8 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    165 W left arrow 205 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Xeon W left arrow Intel Xeon Gold
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 3
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 5300/6300
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    28 left arrow 24
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    56 left arrow 48
  • Hyperthreading
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y und Intel Xeon W-3275M. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Speicher
    2048 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Speicherkanäle
    6 left arrow 8
  • PCIe-Version
    3.0 left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    64 left arrow 64
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon W-3275M und Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    205 W left arrow 165 W
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3275M und Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    38.50 MB left arrow 36.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Cascade Lake W left arrow Ice Lake
  • technisches verfahren
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Steckdose
    LGA 3647 left arrow LGA 4189
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q2/2021

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon W-3275M und Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche