Intel Xeon W-3323
Intel Xeon E-2378
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Xeon W-3323 gegen Intel Xeon E-2378. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q3/2021
Intel Xeon W-3323
Intel Xeon W-3323
Freigegeben
Q3/2021
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Xeon E-2378
Intel Xeon E-2378

Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon W-3323 VS Intel Xeon E-2378. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon W-3323 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz GHz. 12 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 220 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q3/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon E-2378 features a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Xeon W-3323 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon W-3323
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 26% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.50 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    4 Mehr Kerne

    12 left arrow 8

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon W-3323 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    157 place
Intel Xeon E-2378 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon E-2378
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    159 left arrow score
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 19 % bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.80 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.3 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    65 W left arrow 220 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon E-2378 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    89 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    220 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    117 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Xeon W-3323 Intel Xeon W-3323
Intel Xeon E-2378 Intel Xeon E-2378
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Xeon W left arrow Intel Xeon E
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 9
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Xeon W-3300 left arrow Intel Xeon E-2300
  • Vergangenes Modell
    Intel Xeon W-3223 left arrow --
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    3.50 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    12 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    3.90 GHz left arrow 4.80 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    24 left arrow 16
  • Hyperthreading
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E-2378 und Intel Xeon W-3323. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Speicher
    4096 GB left arrow 128 GB
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Nein
  • Speicherkanäle
    8 left arrow 2
  • PCIe-Version
    4.0 left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    64 left arrow 20
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon W-3323 und Intel Xeon E-2378 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    220 W left arrow 65 W
  • Maximale Temperatur
    -- left arrow 100 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3323 und Intel Xeon E-2378, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L2-Cache
    15.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    21.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Ice Lake W left arrow Rocket Lake S
  • technisches verfahren
    10 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Steckdose
    LGA 4189 left arrow LGA 1200
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q3/2021 left arrow Q3/2021

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon W-3323 und Intel Xeon E-2378.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche