Compara AMD FX-9830P VS AMD Athlon PRO 300U. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD FX-9830P boasts a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz GHz. 4 / 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 35 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Publicado en Q2/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD Athlon PRO 300U features a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 20% mejor velocidad de reloj
2.40 GHz
Más número de núcleos
2 Más núcleos
2
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 11% mejor velocidad de reloj en overclocking
3.30 GHz
Posiciones comunes AMD FX-9830P CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Rendimiento por vatio
About 0.43 menos calor generado por el procesador, W.
35 W
Posiciones comunes AMD Athlon PRO 300U CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
AMD FX-9830P
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
AMD Athlon
AMD Athlon PRO 300
Mobile
6
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
normal
No
2.40 GHz
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
1.00 GHz
sin turbo
3
192
2 GB
3
8
14 nm
Q1/2018
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
No
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Athlon PRO 300U y AMD FX-9830P. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2400
32 GB
2
Sí
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-9830P y AMD Athlon PRO 300U to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
15 W
--
--
105 °C
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-9830P y AMD Athlon PRO 300U, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
--
4.00 MB
Picasso (Zen+)
12 nm
AMD-V, SVM
FP5
Q1/2019
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-9830P y AMD Athlon PRO 300U.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
