Porównaj AMD FX-9830P VS AMD Athlon PRO 300U. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD FX-9830P boasts a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz GHz. 4 / 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 35 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q2/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD Athlon PRO 300U features a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 20% lepsza prędkość zegara
2.40 GHz
Większa liczba rdzeni
2 Więcej rdzeni
2
Wyższa prędkość zegara turbo
Wokół 11% lepsza prędkość zegara w trybie overclocked
3.30 GHz
Wspólne stanowiska AMD FX-9830P Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wydajność na wat
About 0.43 mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
35 W
Wspólne stanowiska AMD Athlon PRO 300U Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
AMD FX-9830P
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
AMD Athlon
AMD Athlon PRO 300
Mobile
6
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
normal
Nie
2.40 GHz
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
1.00 GHz
No turbo
3
192
2 GB
3
8
14 nm
Q1/2018
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Nie
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Athlon PRO 300U oraz AMD FX-9830P. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2400
32 GB
2
Tak
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-9830P oraz AMD Athlon PRO 300U to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
15 W
--
--
105 °C
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-9830P oraz AMD Athlon PRO 300U, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
--
4.00 MB
Picasso (Zen+)
12 nm
AMD-V, SVM
FP5
Q1/2019
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-9830P oraz AMD Athlon PRO 300U.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
