Comparez Elbrus-16S VS Baikal-T1. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Elbrus-16S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz. 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q4/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Baikal-T1 features a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 3.9 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Raisons de considérer Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 40% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
1.2 GHz
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
14 Plus de cœurs
2
Positions communes Elbrus-16S CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Performance par watt
About 0.03 moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.
130 W
Positions communes Baikal-T1 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Elbrus-16S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Baikal
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.2 GHz
2
2
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Baikal-T1 et Elbrus-16S. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1600
2
Oui
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Elbrus-16S et Baikal-T1 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
5 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S et Baikal-T1, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
1.00 MB
28 nm
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Elbrus-16S et Baikal-T1.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
