Vergleichen Sie Elbrus-16S VS Baikal-T1. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Elbrus-16S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz. 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q4/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Baikal-T1 features a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 3.9 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 40% höhere taktfrequenz
1.2 GHz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
14 Mehr Kerne
2
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Elbrus-16S CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Leistung pro Watt
About 0.03 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
130 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Baikal-T1 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Elbrus-16S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Baikal
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.2 GHz
2
2
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Baikal-T1 und Elbrus-16S. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1600
2
Ja
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Elbrus-16S und Baikal-T1 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
5 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S und Baikal-T1, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
1.00 MB
28 nm
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Elbrus-16S und Baikal-T1.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
