Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Matrox LUMA A310 vs Intel Arc A580 Graphics. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
2022
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310 and the Intel Arc A580 Graphics to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310 to the Intel Arc A580 Graphics in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

Intel Arc A580 Graphics: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.700 GHz GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 15% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Arc A580 Graphics GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2047 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
Intel Arc A580 Graphics Intel Arc A580 Graphics
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A580 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 384
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3072
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 192
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 24
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 175 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow --
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow --
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow --
  • Width
    -- left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow --
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow 2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow --
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow --

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310
27 fps (avg)
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
10.44
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Latest comparisons