Sélectionner le processeur 1
Sélectionner le processeur 2
Matrox LUMA A310
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Matrox LUMA A310 contre Intel Arc A580 Graphics. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Libéré
2022
Note globale
star star star star star
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310 and the Intel Arc A580 Graphics to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310 to the Intel Arc A580 Graphics in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

Intel Arc A580 Graphics: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.700 GHz GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 2022.

Differences

Videokards Raisons de considérer
Matrox LUMA A310
Signaler un bogue
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 15% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Matrox LUMA A310 GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Plus de mémoire

    50% de mémoire supplémentaire

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Intel Arc A580 Graphics GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2047 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
Intel Arc A580 Graphics Intel Arc A580 Graphics
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Sur la base de
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A580 Graphics
  • Puce GPU
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 384
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3072
  • Unités de sortie de rendu
    16 left arrow 96
  • Unités de texture
    32 left arrow 192
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 24
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Taille de la mémoire
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Type de mémoire
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Vitesse de la mémoire
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Interface mémoire
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
Fréquence d'horloge

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Fréquence de base
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Fréquence maximale
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 175 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Type de ventilateur
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Ventilateur 1
    -- left arrow --
  • Ventilateur 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Type de refroidisseur
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Affichages
    4 left arrow 4
  • Version HDCP
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • Ports HDMI
    -- left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow --
  • Ports DVI
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Résolution maximale
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • DLSS / FSR
    Non left arrow Non
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Codecs vidéo pris en charge

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Longueur
    168 mm left arrow --
  • Hauteur
    69 mm left arrow --
  • Width
    -- left arrow --
  • Largeur (fentes)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow --
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interface GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Date de sortie
    Q2/2023 left arrow 2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • Processus technologique
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow --
  • spécification
    data sheet left arrow --

Benchmarks

Tests de performance GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310 et Intel Arc A580 Graphics.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider possède un benchmark intégré, basé sur le moteur de Crystal Dynamics Foundation.
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310
27 fps (avg)
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Le benchmark FP32 est un calcul en virgule flottante 32 bits pour le GPU, nécessaire pour les jeux en 3D.
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
10.44
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Dernières comparaisons