Prozessor 1 auswählen
Prozessor 2 auswählen
Matrox LUMA A310
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Matrox LUMA A310 gegen Intel Arc A580 Graphics. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Freigegeben
2022
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310 and the Intel Arc A580 Graphics to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310 to the Intel Arc A580 Graphics in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

Intel Arc A580 Graphics: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.700 GHz GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 2022.

Unterschiede

Videokards Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Matrox LUMA A310
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 15% höhere taktfrequenz

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
Videokards Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
Einen Fehler melden
  • Mehr Speicher

    50% mehr Speicher

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Arc A580 Graphics GPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2047 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
Intel Arc A580 Graphics Intel Arc A580 Graphics
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A580 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 384
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3072
  • Render Output Einheiten
    16 left arrow 96
  • Textur Einheiten
    32 left arrow 192
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 24
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Speichergröße
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Speicher Typ
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Speicher Geschwindigkeit
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Speicherschnittstelle
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
Taktfrequenz

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Grundfrequenz
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Maximale Frequenz
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.700 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Übertaktung
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 175 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Ventilator-Typ
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Kühler-Typ
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Schnittstellen

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Anzeigen
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI-Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow --
  • DVI-Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. Auflösung
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • DLSS / FSR
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Unterstützte Videocodecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Abmessungen

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Länge
    168 mm left arrow --
  • Höhe
    69 mm left arrow --
  • Width
    -- left arrow --
  • Breite (Schlitze)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow --
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Schnittstelle
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q2/2023 left arrow 2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • Technologischer Prozess
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Teil-Nr
    LUMA-A310 left arrow --
  • Spezifikation
    data sheet left arrow --

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310 und Intel Arc A580 Graphics.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider hat einen eingebauten Benchmark, der auf der Crystal Dynamics Foundation Engine basiert.
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310
27 fps (avg)
Intel Arc A580 Graphics
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 ist eine 32-Bit-Gleitkommaberechnung für die GPU, die für 3D-Spiele erforderlich ist.
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
10.44
Intel Arc A580 Graphics

Letzte Vergleiche