Comparez Baikal-S VS Elbrus-2000. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Baikal-S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 120 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Elbrus-2000 features a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz GHz. 1 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 6 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2005, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Raisons de considérer Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 86% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
0.3 GHz
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
47 Plus de cœurs
1
Positions communes Baikal-S CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Performance par watt
About 0.05 moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.
120 W
Positions communes Elbrus-2000 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
No data
Baikal-S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Elbrus
Elbrus-1
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
0.3 GHz
1
1
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Baikal-S et Elbrus-2000.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
