比较 Baikal-S VS Elbrus-2000. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Baikal-S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 120 W W, it ensures efficient performance.发布于 Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Elbrus-2000 features a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz GHz. 1 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 6 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2005, it is built to handle demanding applications.
更高的时钟速度
左右 86% 更好的时钟速度
0.3 GHz
更多的核心数量
47 更多的核心
1
共同立场 Baikal-S 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 每瓦特性能
About 0.05 处理器产生的热量更少，W。
120 W
共同立场 Elbrus-2000 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
Baikal-S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Elbrus
Elbrus-1
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
0.3 GHz
1
1
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Baikal-S 和 Elbrus-2000.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
