Vergleichen Sie Baikal-S VS Elbrus-2000. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Baikal-S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 120 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Elbrus-2000 features a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz GHz. 1 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 6 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2005, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 86% höhere taktfrequenz
0.3 GHz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
47 Mehr Kerne
1
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Baikal-S CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Leistung pro Watt
About 0.05 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
120 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Elbrus-2000 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
No data
Baikal-S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Elbrus
Elbrus-1
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
0.3 GHz
1
1
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Baikal-S und Elbrus-2000.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
