Seleccione el procesador 1
Seleccione el procesador 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Matrox LUMA A310F contra ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. Especificaciones, rendimiento, pruebas

Puntuación global
star star star star star
Liberado
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Liberado
Q4/2022
Puntuación global
star star star star star
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310F and the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310F to the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310F: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.200 GHz+ 7 % GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q4/2022.

Diferencias

Videokards Razones a tener en cuenta
Matrox LUMA A310F
Informar de un error

Posiciones en todas las clasificaciones

Posiciones comunes Matrox LUMA A310F GPU en benchmarks populares, para comparar con otros modelos.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • Mayor velocidad de reloj

    En 9% mejor velocidad de reloj

    2.200 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Más memoria

    50% más de memoria

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Posiciones en todas las clasificaciones

Posiciones comunes ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC GPU en benchmarks populares, para comparar con otros modelos.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1215 place

Especificaciones

Datos técnicos
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Basado en
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A750 Graphics
  • Chip GPU
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 448
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3584
  • Unidades de salida de renderizado
    16 left arrow 112
  • Unidades de textura
    32 left arrow 224
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 28
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Tamaño de la memoria
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Tipo de memoria
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Velocidad de la memoria
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Interfaz de memoria
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
Frecuencia del reloj

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Frecuencia base
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
  • Frecuencia máxima
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    left arrow
Consumo de energía

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Tipo de ventilador
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Ventilador 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Ventilador 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Tipo de refrigerador
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Muestra
    4 left arrow 4
  • Versión HDCP
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • Puertos HDMI
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v2.0
  • Puertos DVI
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Resolución máxima
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    left arrow
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Códecs de vídeo compatibles

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensiones

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Longitud
    168 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • Altura
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 48 mm
  • Anchura (ranuras)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 785 g
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interfaz de la GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Fecha de publicación
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • proceso tecnológico
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Parte-no
    LUMA-A310F left arrow A750 CLD 8GO
  • especificación
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Puntos de referencia

Pruebas de rendimiento GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310F y ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider tiene un punto de referencia integrado, basado en el motor de Crystal Dynamics Foundation.
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310F
43 fps (avg)
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 es un cálculo en coma flotante de 32 bits para la GPU, necesario para los juegos 3D.
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
15.76
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Últimas comparaciones