Matrox LUMA A310F kontra ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. Specyfikacje, wydajność, testy

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

• Na podstawie
  Intel Arc A310 Graphics Intel Arc A750 Graphics
• Układ GPU
  ACM-G11 (Alchemist) ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
• Streaming Multiprocessors
  96 448
• Shader
  768 3584
• Jednostki wyjściowe renderingu
  16 112
• Jednostki tekstury
  32 224
• Raytracing Cores
  6 28

Here is a comparison of memory configurations Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

• Rozmiar pamięci
  4 GB 8 GB
• Typ pamięci
  GDDR6 GDDR6
• Memory Clock
  1.938 GHz 2.000 GHz
• Szybkość pamięci
  15.5 Gbps 16 Gbps
• Memory bandwidth
  124 GB/s 512 GB/s
• Interfejs pamięci
  64 bit 256 bit

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

• Częstotliwość podstawowa
  2.000 GHz 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
• Maksymalna częstotliwość
  2.000 GHz 2.200 GHz
• Avg (Game) Clock
  -- --
• Overclocking
  Tak Tak

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

• TDP
  50 W-33 % 225 W
• TDP (up)
  -- --
• Tjunction max
  -- --
• PCIe-Power
  -- 2 x 8-Pin

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

• Fan-Type
  Radial Axial
• Wentylator 1
  1 x 70 mm 2 x 100 mm
• Wentylator 2
  -- --
• Cooler-Type
  Air cooling Air cooling
• Noise (Idle)
  0 dB / Silent 0 dB / Silent
• Noise (Load)
  -- --

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

• Max. Wyświetlacze
  4 4
• HDCP-Version
  2.3 2.3
• Porty HDMI
  -- 2x HDMI v2.1
• DP Ports
  4x DP v2.1 2x DP v2.0
• Porty DVI
  -- --
• VGA Ports
  -- --
• USB-C Ports
  -- --

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

• Maks. rozdzielczość
  7680x4320 7680x4320
• DirectX
  12_2 (Ultimate) 12_2 (Ultimate)
• Raytracing
  Tak Tak
• DLSS / FSR
  Nie Nie
• LED
  No LED lighting No LED lighting

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

• h264
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• h265 / HEVC
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• VP8
  Nie Nie
• VP9
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• AV1
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

• Długość
  168 mm 271 mm
• Wysokość
  69 mm 132 mm
• Width
  -- 48 mm
• Szerokość (szczeliny)
  1 PCIe-Slots 3 PCIe-Slots
• Weight
  -- 785 g

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F oraz ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

• Interfejs GPU
  PCIe 4.0 x 8 PCIe 4.0 x 16
• Data wydania
  Q2/2023 Q4/2022
• Launch Price
  -- --
• Proces technologiczny
  6 nm 6 nm
• Część nr
  LUMA-A310F A750 CLD 8GO
• specyfikacja
  data sheet data sheet