프로세서 1 선택
프로세서 2 선택
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Matrox LUMA A310F vs ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. 사양, 성능, 테스트

종합 점수
star star star star star
출시
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
출시
Q4/2022
종합 점수
star star star star star
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310F and the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310F to the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310F: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.200 GHz+ 7 % GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q4/2022.

차이점

Videokards 고려해야 하는 이유
Matrox LUMA A310F
버그 신고하기

모든 순위의 순위

공통 위치 Matrox LUMA A310F 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 GPU.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • 더 빠른 클럭 속도

    주변 9% 더 나은 클럭 속도

    2.200 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • 더 많은 메모리

    50메모리 % 증가

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

모든 순위의 순위

공통 위치 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 GPU.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1215 place

사양

기술 데이터
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • 기준
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A750 Graphics
  • GPU 칩
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 448
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3584
  • 렌더링 출력 유닛 (ROP)
    16 left arrow 112
  • 텍스처 단위 (TMU)
    32 left arrow 224
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 28
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • 메모리 크기
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • 메모리 유형
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • 메모리 속도
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • 메모리 인터페이스
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
클럭 속도

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • 기본 시계
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
  • 부스트 클럭
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • 오버클러킹
    left arrow
열 관리

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • 팬 유형
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • 팬 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • 팬 2
    -- left arrow --
  • 쿨러 유형
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
인터페이스

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • 최대. 디스플레이
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP 버전
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI 포트
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v2.0
  • DVI 포트
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • 최대 해상도
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • 레이 트레이싱
    left arrow
  • DLSS / FSR
    아니요 left arrow 아니요
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
지원되는 비디오 코덱

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    아니요 left arrow 아니요
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
치수

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • 길이
    168 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • 높이
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 48 mm
  • '너비(슬롯)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 785 g
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU 인터페이스
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • 릴리스 날짜
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • 구조 크기
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310F left arrow A750 CLD 8GO
  • 문서
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

벤치마크

성능 테스트 GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310F 그리고 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
섀도우 오브 더 Tomb Raider에는 Crystal Dynamics Foundation 엔진을 기반으로 하는 벤치마크가 내장되어 있습니다.
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310F
43 fps (avg)
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
벤치마크 FP32는 3D 게이밍에 필요한 GPU용 32비트 부동 소수점 계산입니다.
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
15.76
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

최신 비교