Sélectionner le processeur 1
Sélectionner le processeur 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Matrox LUMA A310F contre ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Libéré
Q4/2022
Note globale
star star star star star
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310F and the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310F to the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

Matrox LUMA A310F: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.200 GHz+ 7 % GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q4/2022.

Differences

Videokards Raisons de considérer
Matrox LUMA A310F
Signaler un bogue

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Matrox LUMA A310F GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 9% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    2.200 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Plus de mémoire

    50% de mémoire supplémentaire

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1215 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Sur la base de
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A750 Graphics
  • Puce GPU
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 448
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3584
  • Unités de sortie de rendu
    16 left arrow 112
  • Unités de texture
    32 left arrow 224
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 28
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Taille de la mémoire
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Type de mémoire
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Vitesse de la mémoire
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Interface mémoire
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
Fréquence d'horloge

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Fréquence de base
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
  • Fréquence maximale
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Type de ventilateur
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Ventilateur 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Ventilateur 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Type de refroidisseur
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Affichages
    4 left arrow 4
  • Version HDCP
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • Ports HDMI
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v2.0
  • Ports DVI
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Résolution maximale
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • DLSS / FSR
    Non left arrow Non
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Codecs vidéo pris en charge

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Longueur
    168 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • Hauteur
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 48 mm
  • Largeur (fentes)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 785 g
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interface GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Date de sortie
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • Processus technologique
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310F left arrow A750 CLD 8GO
  • spécification
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Tests de performance GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider possède un benchmark intégré, basé sur le moteur de Crystal Dynamics Foundation.
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310F
43 fps (avg)
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Le benchmark FP32 est un calcul en virgule flottante 32 bits pour le GPU, nécessaire pour les jeux en 3D.
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
15.76
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Dernières comparaisons